Conference Paper (published)
Details
Citation
Little A, Apicella CL & Marlowe FW (2007) Preferences for symmetry in human faces in two cultures: data from the UK and the Hadza, an isolated group of hunter-gatherers. In: volume 274. The Royal Society, pp. 3113-3117. http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/274/1629/3113.full; https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0895
Abstract
Many studies show agreement within and between cultures for general judgements of facial attractiveness. Few studies, however, have examined the attractiveness of specific traits and few have examined preferences in huntergathers. The current study examined preferences for symmetry in both the UK and in a hunter/gather society, the Hadza of Tanzania. We found that symmetry was more attractive than asymmetry across both cultures and was more strongly preferred by the Hadza than in the UK. The different ecological conditions may play a role in generating this difference. Such variation in preference may be adaptive if it reflects adaptation to local conditions. Symmetry is thought to indicate genetic quality, which may be more important among the Hadza with much higher mortality rates from birth onward. Hadza men who were more often named as good hunters were also deemed more attractive by Hadza women. These men placed greater value on symmetry in female faces. These results suggest high quality Hadza men are more discriminating in their choice of faces. Hadza women had increased preferences for symmetry in men’s faces when they were pregnant or nursing, perhaps due to their increased discrimination and sensitivity to foods and disease harmful to a fetus or nursing infant. These results imply that symmetry is an evolutionarily relevant trait and that variation in symmetry preference appears strategic both between cultures and within individuals of a single culture.
Keywords
faces; agreement; culture; symmetry; Face Anatomy; Sex differences (Psychology); Sexual attraction; Symmetry (Biology); Masculinity
Journal
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences: Volume 274, Issue 1629
Status | Published |
---|---|
Publication date | 31/12/2007 |
Publication date online | 10/07/2007 |
URL | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/923 |
Publisher | The Royal Society |
Publisher URL | http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/…4/1629/3113.full |
ISSN | 0962-8452 |
eISSN | 1471-2954 |