Book Chapter
Details
Citation
Gillespie A (2007) The social basis of self-reflection. In: Valsiner J & Rosa A (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology. Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology. New York, NY US: Cambridge University Press, pp. 678-691. http://www.cambridge.org/gb/knowledge/isbn/item6026650/?site_locale=en_GB
Abstract
The present chapter begins with a review of socio-cultural theories of the origins self-reflection. Four types of theory can be distinguished: rupture theories, mirror theories, conflict theories, and internalization theories. In order to address the limitations of these theories, Mead's theory of the social act is advanced. These theories are then evaluated against an empirical instance of self-reflection and a novel conception of complex semiotic systems is proposed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved) (from the chapter)
Keywords
10; 3100; AFFILIATION; audience; C; Classification; COMPLEX; conflict; DATE; empirical; factors; internalization; language; LIMITATIONS; Mead; media; mirror; NUMBER; ORDER; ORIGIN; Perception; Personality; Population; professional; Psychological Theories; Psychological Theory; PSYCHOLOGY; Psycinfo; RECORD; Reflectiveness; RELEASE; Research; review; rights; Scotland; SELF; Self Perception; SELF-perception; self-reflection; Semiotics; social acts; SOCIOCULTURAL factors; sociocultural psychology; sociocultural theory; Stirling; SYSTEM; Systems; Theories; THEORY; universities
Status | Published |
---|---|
Title of series | Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology |
Publication date | 31/12/2007 |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Publisher URL | http://www.cambridge.org/…ite_locale=en_GB |
Place of publication | New York, NY US |
ISBN | 9780521854108 |