Article

Adolescents' preferences for sexual dimorphism are influenced by relative exposure to male and female faces

Details

Citation

Saxton TK, Little A, DeBruine LM, Jones BC & Roberts SC (2009) Adolescents' preferences for sexual dimorphism are influenced by relative exposure to male and female faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 47 (8), pp. 864-868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.005

Abstract
Exposure to a particular population of faces can increase ratings of the normality and attractiveness of similar-looking faces. Such exposure can also refine the perceived boundaries of that face population, such that other faces are more readily perceived as dissimilar. We predicted that relatively less exposure to opposite-sex faces, as experienced by children at single-sex compared with mixed-sex schools, would decrease ratings of the attractiveness of sexual dimorphism in opposite-sex faces (that is, boys at singlesex schools would show a decreased preference for feminised faces, and girls at single-sex schools would show a decreased preference for masculinised faces). Consistent with this prediction, girls at single-sex compared with mixed-sex schools demonstrated significantly stronger preferences for facial femininity in both male and female faces. Boys at single-sex compared with mixed-sex schools demonstrated marginally stronger preferences for facial masculinity in male faces, but did not differ in their ratings of female faces. These effects were attenuated among some single-sex school pupils by the presence of adolescent opposite-sex siblings. These data add to the evidence that long-term exposure to a particular face population can influence judgements of other faces, and contribute to our understanding of the factors leading to individual differences in face preferences.

Keywords
Facial attractiveness; Facial sexual dimorphism; Femininity; Individual differences; Masculinity; Visual adaptation

Journal
Personality and Individual Differences: Volume 47, Issue 8

StatusPublished
Publication date31/12/2009
Date accepted by journal06/07/2009
URLhttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/10771
PublisherElsevier
ISSN0191-8869

People (1)

Professor Craig Roberts

Professor Craig Roberts

Professor of Social Psychology, Psychology