Working Paper

Inclusive and Exclusive Social Preferences: A Deweyan Framework to Explain Governance Heterogeneity

Details

Citation

Sacchetti S (2013) Inclusive and Exclusive Social Preferences: A Deweyan Framework to Explain Governance Heterogeneity.

Abstract
We suggest that the pragmatist theory of public interest has implications for the contraposition between self-regarding and other-regarding preferences in economics. We re-consider this distinction and replace some of the existing categories with the idea of inclusive and exclusive social preferences over both organizational and strategic decision-making domains. The value is in the idea of both exclusive and inclusive preferences being social in nature and in the application both to the internal organization and its impacts on people outside. Our framework explains governance heterogeneity by contrasting exclusive and inclusive social preferences in cooperatives, social enterprises, as well as traditional corporations. A discussion of the evolution of social preferences is addressed through examples and regional experiences. We argue that the social preferences perspective contributes to understand the cause of strategic failure in the development of localities and regions.

Keywords
cooperative firms; decision-making; enquiry; firm governance; inclusion; John Dewey; public interest; social enterprises; social preferences; stakeholders

JEL codes

  • B00: History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches
  • L20: Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior: General
  • L30: Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise: General

StatusUnpublished
Publication date online28/02/2013
URLhttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/11346
PublisherInstitute for Socio-Management, Stirling Management School, University of Stirling