Article
Details
Citation
Haddock A (2011) Meaning, Justification, and 'Primitive Normativity'. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 86 (1), pp. 147-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2012.00212.x
Abstract
I critically discuss two claims which Hannah Ginsborg makes on behalf of her account of meaning in terms of ‘primitive normativity'(2011; 2012): first, that it avoids the sceptical regress articulated by Kripke's Wittgenstein; second, that it makes sense of the thought-central to Kripke's Wittgenstein-that ‘meaning is normative', in a way which shows this thought not only to be immune from recent criticisms but also to undermine reductively naturalistic theories of content. In the course of the discussion, I consider and attempt to shed light on a number of issues: the structure of the sceptical regress; the content of the thought that ‘meaning is normative', and its force against reductive theories; the connection between meaning and justification; and the notion of ‘primitive normativity'.
Keywords
Rule-following; Kripke; meaning; "primitive normativity"
Journal
Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume: Volume 86, Issue 1
Status | Published |
---|---|
Publication date | 30/06/2011 |
Publication date online | 06/2011 |
Date accepted by journal | 21/12/2011 |
URL | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/19291 |
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell for the Aristotelian Society |
ISSN | 0309-7013 |
eISSN | 1467-8349 |