Contingent valuation versus choice experiments: Estimating the benefits of environmentally sensitive areas in Scotland

Citation

Hanley N, Macmillan D, Wright RE, Bullock CH, Simpson I, Parsisson D & Crabtree R (1998) Contingent valuation versus choice experiments: Estimating the benefits of environmentally sensitive areas in Scotland. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49 (1), pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1998.tb01248.x

Abstract
This paper reports results from a study of the economic value of the conservation benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) in Scotland. The main novelty of the approach taken is in comparing two direct valuation methods, namely contingent valuation and choice experiments, to value these benefits. The Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) is well-established as a technique for valuing the sorts of landscape and wildlife enhancements associated with ESAs. The CVM experiment reported here uses a dichotomous choice format, and includes a new correction for part-whole bias. Choice experiments are much less used as an environmental valuation technique. We note several advantages of such experiments over CVM, and then report characteristic values and ‘programme values' estimated using the method. This application brings to light some problems in applying the choice experiment method. Finally, we discuss the issue of benefits transfer in the context of these two approaches to valuation.

Journal
Journal of Agricultural Economics: Volume 49, Issue 1