Article
Details
Citation
Rouder J, Engelhardt C, McCabe S & Morey R (2016) Model comparison in ANOVA. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23 (6), pp. 1779-1786. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1026-5
Abstract
Analysis of variance (ANOVA), the workhorse analysis of experimental designs, consists of F-tests of main effects and interactions. Yet, testing, including traditional ANOVA, has been recently critiqued on a number of theoretical and practical grounds. In light of these critiques, model comparison and model selection serve as an attractive alternative. Model comparison differs from testing in that one can support a null or nested model vis-a-vis a more general alternative by penalizing more flexible models. We argue this ability to support more simple models allows for more nuanced theoretical conclusions than provided by traditional ANOVA F-tests. We provide a model comparison strategy and show how ANOVA models may be reparameterized to better address substantive questions in data analysis.
Keywords
ANOVA; Statistical models; Interactions; Model comparison; Order-restricted inference
Journal
Psychonomic Bulletin and Review: Volume 23, Issue 6
Status | Published |
---|---|
Publication date | 31/12/2016 |
Publication date online | 11/04/2016 |
Date accepted by journal | 03/03/2016 |
URL | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23123 |
Publisher | Springer |
ISSN | 1069-9384 |
eISSN | 1531-5320 |