Temporary organizational forms and coopetition in cycling: What makes a breakaway successful in the Tour de France?

Citation

Scelles N, Mignot J, Cabaud B & Francois A (2018) Temporary organizational forms and coopetition in cycling: What makes a breakaway successful in the Tour de France?. Team Performance Management, 24 (3/4), pp. 122-134. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-03-2017-0012

Abstract
Purpose: In road cycling races, one of riders’ main objectives is to win stages, which most often requires breaking away from the pack of riders. What is it that makes a breakaway succeed, i.e. enable one of its members to win the stage? Design/methodology/approach: Descriptive statistics were computed and a logit model of breakaway success was estimated, based on a new kind of statistical data describing the development of each of the 268 breakaways that occurred in the 76 regular stages of the Tour de France 2013 to 2016. Findings: Breakaway success partly depends on the physics of cycling: breakaways are more successful when the stage is hilly or in mountain than flat. In addition, the likelihood of breakaway success depends on strategic moves such as attack timing and the percentage of riders with a teammate in the breakaway. Research limitations/implications: Understanding why certain breakaways succeed and others do not is useful to comprehend cycling performance and to help coopetitive temporary organizational forms such as breakaways optimize their strategic behavior. A limitation is the focus on the Tour de France only. Originality/value: The present study adds to the literature on temporary organizational forms, coopetition and cycling performance by analyzing within-stage data in cycling and, as such, enabling to capture its strategic dimension.

Keywords
temporary organizational forms; coopetition; cycling; breakaway; strategic behavior; Tour de France

Journal
Team Performance Management: Volume 24, Issue 3/4

• PDF_Proof.pdf