Emerging into the rainforest: Emergence and special science ontology

Citation

Franklin A & Robertson K (2024) Emerging into the rainforest: Emergence and special science ontology. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 14 (4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-024-00622-4

Abstract
Scientific realists don’t standardly discriminate between, say, biology and fundamental physics when deciding whether the evidence and explanatory power warrant the inclusion of new entities in our ontology. As such, scientific realists are committed to a lush rainforest of special science kinds (Ross, 2000). Viruses certainly inhabit this rainforest – their explanatory power is overwhelming – but viruses’ properties can be explained from the bottom up: reductive explanations involving amino acids are generally available. However, reduction has often been taken to lead to a metaphysical downgrading, so how can viruses keep their place in the rainforest? In this paper, we show how the inhabitants of the rainforest can be inoculated against the eliminative threat of reduction: by demonstrating that they are emergent. According to our account, emergence involves a screening off condition as well as novelty. We go on to demonstrate that this account of emergence, which is compatible with theoretical reducibility, satisfies common intuitions concerning what should and shouldn’t count as real: viruses are emergent, as are trout and turkeys, but philosophically gerrymandered objects like trout-turkeys do not qualify.

Keywords
Philosophy of science; Philosophy of special sciences;Autonomy; Emergence; Reduction; Ontology; Causal markov conditions

Journal
European Journal for Philosophy of Science: Volume 14, Issue 4

• Emerging into the rainforest: Emergence and special science ontology