Simultaneous Regularity Contrast and Luminance Polarity

Citation

Kingdom F, Sun H, Gheorghiu E & Sellier Silva M (2025) Simultaneous Regularity Contrast and Luminance Polarity. Vision. https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5150/9/1/23; https://doi.org/10.3390/+vision9010023

Abstract
Texture regularity, for example, the repeating pattern of a carpet, brickwork, or tree bark, is a ubiquitous feature of the visual world. The perception of regularity has generally been studied using multi-element textures whose regularity is manipulated by the ad-dition of random jitter to the elements’ nominal positions. Here, we investigate the se-lectivity of regularity perception for the luminance contrast polarities of the elements. Our psychophysical tool was simultaneous regularity contrast, or SRC, the phenomenon in which the perceived regularity of a central test texture is shifted away from that of the surrounding regularity. Stimuli were composed of arrays of dark and/or white Gaussian elements. Surround and center test textures consisted of either the same (“congruent”) or opposite (“incongruent”) polarities. In addition, we tested a “mixed” condition consisting of a random mixture of polarities in both the surround and test. The perceived regularity of the test was measured using a match stimulus with the same polarity dimension as the test. The regularity of the match stimulus was adjusted on each trial using a forced-choice staircase procedure and the point-of-subjective equality between the match and test regularities was estimated from the resulting psychometric functions. SRC was observed in both congruent and incongruent conditions, but with the mixed condition, the per-ceived regularity of the test was shifted toward rather than away from the surround regularity, an example of assimilation, not contrast. The analysis revealed no significant difference in the magnitude of SRC between the congruent and incongruent conditions, suggesting that SRC could be mediated solely by polarity agnostic mechanisms, although there are other possible explanations for the “null” result. However, trend analysis using a non-linear (sigmoidal-shaped) function indicated a significant difference between the congruent and incongruent conditions, which, together with the mixed polarity results, suggests the presence of at least some polarity selective mechanisms. Previous reports have suggested that regularity perception is encoded by the “peakedness” in the dis-tribution of spatial-frequency-tuned linear filter responses. We modeled SRC quantita-tively by incorporating peakedness with spatial-frequency-selective surround inhibition and found that the model gave a good account of the SRC data. Possible reasons for the assimilation effect found with the mixed polarity condition are discussed.

Journal
Vision