Article
Details
Citation
Thompson TL & Adams C (2020) Accountabilities of posthuman research. Explorations in Media Ecology, 19 (3), pp. 337-349. https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00050_7
Abstract
What constitutes ‘good’ posthuman research? This article offers three dynamics to help assess the value of posthuman-inspired inquiry. We propose that a good posthuman research account should show evidence that the researcher: (1) attended to their own more-than-humanness and made explicit how they interviewed and attuned to the nonhuman things of their inquiry; (2) reassembled resemblings of the posthuman world by inventively weaving and fusing human and nonhuman storylines; and (3) offered analytic insights into the liveliness of posthuman research work as the performativity of difference.
Keywords
credibility; more-than-human; posthuman; posthuman accounts; qualitative research; quality; rigour
Journal
Explorations in Media Ecology: Volume 19, Issue 3
Status | Published |
---|---|
Publication date | 01/09/2020 |
Publication date online | 01/09/2020 |
Date accepted by journal | 10/02/2020 |
URL | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31883 |
Publisher | Intellect |
ISSN | 1539-7785 |
eISSN | 2048-0717 |
People (1)
Senior Lecturer, Education