The permissible norm of truth and "ought implies can"

Citation

Wei X (2019) The permissible norm of truth and "ought implies can". Logos and Episteme, 10 (4), pp. 433-440. https://doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme201910438

Abstract
Many philosophers hold that a norm of truth governs the propositional attitude of belief. According to one popular construal of normativity, normativity is prescriptive in nature. The prescriptive norm can be formulated either in terms of obligation or permission: one ought to or may believe that p just in case p is true. It has been argued that the obligation norm is jointly incompatible with the maxim ought implies can and the assumption that there exists some truth that we cannot believe. The problem of the incompatible triad has motivated some to adopt the permissible norm of truth. I argue that the permissible norm faces an analogous problem of the incompatible triad.

Keywords
epistemic norms; ought implies can; nature of belief; the truth; norm of belie

Journal
Logos and Episteme: Volume 10, Issue 4

• Published version