Article

Understanding the unintended consequences of public health policies: the views of policymakers and evaluators

Details

Citation

Oliver K, Lorenc T, Tinkler J & Bonell C (2019) Understanding the unintended consequences of public health policies: the views of policymakers and evaluators. BMC Public Health, 19 (1), Art. No.: 1057. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7389-6

Abstract
Background Public health policies sometimes have unexpected effects. Understanding how policies and interventions lead to outcomes is essential if policymakers and researchers are to intervene effectively and reduce harmful and other unintended consequences (UCs) of their actions. Yet, evaluating complex mechanisms and outcomes is challenging, even before considering how to predict assess and understand outcomes and UCs when interventions are scaled up. We aimed to explore with UK policymakers why some policies have UCs, and how researchers and policymakers should respond. Methods We convened a one-day workshop with 14 people involved in developing, implementing or evaluating social and public health policies, and/or evaluating possible unintended effects. This included senior evaluators, policymakers from government and associated agencies, and researchers, covering policy domains from public health, social policy, poverty, and international development. Results Policymakers suggested UCs happen for a range of reasons: poor policy design, unclear articulation of policy mechanisms or goals, or unclear or inappropriate evidence use, including evaluation techniques. While not always avoidable, it was felt that UCs could be partially mitigated by better use of theory and evidence, better involvement of stakeholders in concurrent design and evaluation of policies, and appropriate evaluation systems. Conclusions UCs can be used to explore the mechanisms underpinning social change caused by public health policies. Articulating these mechanisms is essential for truly evidence-informed decision-making, to enable informed debate about policy options, and to develop evaluation techniques. Future work includes trying to develop a holistic stakeholder-led evaluation process.

Keywords
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Journal
BMC Public Health: Volume 19, Issue 1

StatusPublished
FundersJohn Fell Fund, University of Oxford
Publication date06/08/2019
Publication date online06/08/2019
Date accepted by journal26/07/2019
URLhttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/30156
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
eISSN1471-2458

People (1)

Ms Jane Tinkler

Ms Jane Tinkler

PhD Researcher, Sociology, Social Policy & Criminology

Files (1)