Commentary

Two challenges to the embodied version of the autopoietic theory

Details

Citation

Clavel Vázquez MJ (2019) Two challenges to the embodied version of the autopoietic theory. Adaptive Behavior, 28 (1), pp. 41-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712319839641

Abstract
“Are living beings extended autopoietic systems? An embodied reply”, Villalobos and Razeto-Barry offer an articulation of the embodied aspect of the autopoietic theory. Their aim is to block the extended interpretation of this theory. For them, living beings are, simply put, autopoietic bodies. In this commentary, I advance two concerns regarding the alleged cases of extended living beings. On the one hand, I argue that their proposal fails to account for the intuitive difference between these cases and living beings that are embedded in the environment. On the other hand, I argue that, from the perspective offered by the authors, there also seems to be a problem in the way the boundaries of a system are delineated.

Keywords
Autopoiesis; extended cognition; extended autopoietic systems; enactivism

Journal
Adaptive Behavior: Volume 28, Issue 1

StatusEarly Online
Publication date online08/04/2019
Date accepted by journal08/04/2019
ISSN1059-7123
eISSN1741-2633