Article
Details
Citation
Zietsch BP, Lee AJ, Sherlock JM & Jern P (2015) Variation in Women's Preferences Regarding Male Facial Masculinity Is Better Explained by Genetic Differences Than by Previously Identified Context-Dependent Effects. Psychological Science, 26 (9), pp. 1440-1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615591770
Abstract
Women’s preferences for masculine versus feminine male faces are highly variable. According to a dominant theory in evolutionary psychology, this variability results from adaptations that optimise preferences by calibrating them to certain contextual factors, including women’s self-perceived attractiveness, short- versus long-term relationship orientation, pathogen disgust sensitivity, and stage of the menstrual cycle. The theory does not account for the possible contribution of genetic variation on women’s facial masculinity preference. Using a large sample (N = 2,160) of identical and nonidentical female Finnish twins and their siblings, we showed that the proportion of variation in women’s preferences regarding male facial masculinity that was attributable to genetic variation (38%) dwarfed the variation due to the combined effect of contextual factors (< 1%). These findings cast doubt on the importance of these context-dependent effects and may suggest a need for refocusing in the field toward understanding the wide genetic variation in these preferences and how this variation relates to the evolution of sexual dimorphism in faces.
Keywords
evolutionary psychology; behaviour genetics;
Journal
Psychological Science: Volume 26, Issue 9
Status | Published |
---|---|
Funders | Australian Research Council |
Publication date | 01/09/2015 |
Publication date online | 07/08/2015 |
Date accepted by journal | 25/05/2015 |
URL | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/28705 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
ISSN | 0956-7976 |
eISSN | 1467-9280 |
People (1)
Lecturer in Psychology, Psychology