Article
Details
Citation
Cookson G, Jones S & McIntosh B (2013) Cancelled procedures: inequality, inequity and the National Health Service reforms. Health Economics, 22 (7), pp. 870-876. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/hec.2860; https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.2860
Abstract
Using data for every elective procedure in 2007 in the English National Health Service, we found evidence of socioeconomic inequality in the probability of having a procedure cancelled after admission while controlling for a range of patient and provider characteristics. Whether this disparity is inequitable is inconclusive.; Using data for every elective procedure in 2007 in the English National Health Service, we found evidence of socioeconomic inequality in the probability of having a procedure cancelled after admission while controlling for a range of patient and provider characteristics. Whether this disparity is inequitable is inconclusive. Copyright A[c] 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; � Using data for every elective procedure in 2007 in the English National Health Service, we found evidence of socioeconomic inequality in the probability of having a procedure cancelled after admission while controlling for a range of patient and provider characteristics. Whether this disparity is inequitable is inconclusive.
Keywords
Healthcare - organization & administration Healthcare Disparities - statistics & numerical data Health services accessibility Healthcare reform National Health Service (NHS) reforms Equality Equity Cancelled procedures Health and inequality Europe Healthcare markets Socialized medicine Socioeconomic factors Health economics Cancellations
Status | Published |
---|---|
Publication date | 31/12/2013 |
Publication date online | 07/06/2013 |
Date accepted by journal | 08/06/2012 |
URL | http://hdl.handle.net/10454/6501 |
Publisher URL | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/hec.2860 |
ISSN | 1057-9230 |
eISSN | 1099-1050 |